Chelsea Boatyard Owners Lose £1.6m Tax Appeal

Chelsea Yacht & Boat Company owners failed in their £1.6m tax relief appeal regarding entrepreneurs’ relief. Tribunal rejects claim but reverses significant penalties initially imposed by HMRC.
June 17, 2025
4
Charles Davies
June 17, 2025
4

Chelsea Boatyard Owners’ Tax Relief Hopes Derailed

Owners of the Chelsea Yacht & Boat Company, located at Cheyne Pier in central London, have lost a significant tax appeal for over £1.6 million. The case, rooted in a dispute over entrepreneurs’ relief (since renamed business asset disposal relief), highlights the changing regulatory landscape and the challenges in qualifying for specific tax reliefs.

Details of the Appeal

The Chelsea Yacht & Boat Company, incorporated in 1947 and known as a historic boatyard offering moorings, maintenance, and repair services, became the subject of a major tax case. Andrew and Charlotte Moffatt, the principal shareholders, appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) after HMRC rejected their claims for entrepreneurs’ relief totaling £887,770.70 and £888,123.80, relating to the sale of their shareholdings.

What Changed?

  • Entrepreneurs’ relief, introduced to encourage business investment, was reformed in March 2020.
  • The lifetime allowance was reduced from £10 million to £1 million per individual and is now called business asset disposal relief (BADR).
  • The Moffatts' claim was scrutinised under these new, stricter rules, ultimately leading to HMRC's refusal.

    Tribunal Outcome: Relief Refused, Penalties Reviewed

    The FTT upheld HMRC’s decision to disallow the relief, meaning neither Andrew nor Charlotte Moffatt could access the substantial tax reduction. However, there was a partial reprieve: a £360,000 penalty initially imposed for alleged errors was overturned by the tribunal, offering some financial relief.

    Key points from the judgment:

  • The owners’ claims did not meet current eligibility requirements.
  • A significant penalty for errors in the claim was judged excessive and was therefore cancelled.
  • Practical Lessons for Business Owners

    This case underscores several important considerations for anyone contemplating the sale of a business:

    1. Understand Current Relief Rules: Tax regimes and thresholds can change rapidly. Business owners should regularly review available reliefs well before a sale.

    2. Maintain Robust Documentation: Ensure all records pertaining to business activities and financial operations are accurate and up to date.

    3. Seek Professional Advice Early: Specialist tax advice is crucial when planning significant transactions to avoid costly errors and penalties.

    Perspectives from the Tribunal

    The FTT’s ruling emphasised the importance of compliance with the latest regulations. In its reasoning, the tribunal noted:

    “While the appellants’ belief in their eligibility is understandable, the legislation as amended does not permit the claimed relief.”

    Moreover, the removal of penalties was based on a finding that any errors were not deliberate attempts to mislead, signalling a measure of goodwill in the tribunal’s approach.

    Looking Ahead

    This decision serves as a reminder that timing and understanding of evolving tax legislation are critical. The significant sums involved highlight the high stakes for business owners, reinforcing the need for:
  • Up-to-date tax planning
  • Ongoing engagement with professional advisers
  • Monitoring HMRC guidance and tribunal trends
  • Next steps:

  • Review current eligibility for any business asset disposal relief before entering into share disposals.
  • Consider a proactive audit of business structures ahead of transactional events.
  • Stay informed through trusted sources and regular professional updates.

Key Figures Amount
Andrew Moffatt £887,770.70
Charlotte Moffatt £888,123.80
Penalty Overturned £360,000
Stay ahead of regulatory changes to safeguard your business exit plans.

Find the UK’s leading payroll solutions